六五文档>基础教育>知识点>专题05 【培优小题狂练】阅读理解“态度推断”题(考情+技法+真题+模拟)-2024年新高考英语二轮
专题05 【培优小题狂练】阅读理解“态度推断”题(考情+技法+真题+模拟)-2024年新高考英语二轮
格式:docx页数:15页大小:689.4 K上传日期:2024-01-06 15:57浏览次数:233 侵权/举报

2024年新高考英语二轮复习【培优小题狂练】专题05阅读理解“态度推断”题(考情+技法+真题+模拟)原卷版【近年高考考情】1.(2023年新高考I卷)第35题P12.(2023年全国甲卷)第31题P23.(2023年全国乙卷)第23题P34.(2022北京卷)第34题P35.(2021年新高考I卷)第34题P46.(2021年全国甲卷)第34题P57.(2020全国I卷)第34题P6【解题实用技法】 态度观点态度类试题的解题方法:第一:结合题干人物和内容定位原文出现在哪一(些)段;然后仔细比对该句言外之意;第二:加入自己的态度。要注意区分试题考查的是作者的态度还是作者引用别人的态度;第三:态度没有明确提出时,要学会根据作者在文章中所运用词汇的褒贬性去判断作者的态度,尤其是动词、形容词和副词,如wonderfully,successfully,unfortunately,doubtfully等。乐观支持类词汇:optimistic乐观的;positive肯定的;favorable支持的,赞同的;supportive支持的;approving赞成的客观中立类词汇:objective客观的;neutral中立的;cautious谨慎的消极反对类词汇:negative否定的;opposite相反的;unfair公正的;doubtful怀疑的;indifferent漠不关心的;critical批评的;ironic讽刺的;skeptical质疑的;disappointed失望的;disapproving不赞同的;pessimistic悲观的;dismissive轻蔑的,不屑一顾的【高考真题再练】 01(2023年新高考I卷D篇)OnMarch7,1907,theEnglishstatisticianFrancisGaltonpublishedapaperwhichillustratedwhathascometobeknownasthe“wisdomofcrowds”effect.Theexperimentofestimationheconductedshowedthatinsomecases,theaverageofalargenumberofindependentestimatescouldbequiteaccurate.Thiseffectcapitalizesonthefactthatwhenpeoplemakeerrors,thoseerrorsaren’talwaysthesame.Somepeoplewilltendtooverestimate,andsometounderestimate.Whenenoughoftheseerrorsareaveragedtogether,theycanceleachotherout,resultinginamoreaccurateestimate.Ifpeoplearesimilarandtendtomakethesameerrors,thentheirerrorswon’tcanceleachotherout.Inmoretechnicalterms,thewisdomofcrowdsrequiresthatpeople’sestimatesbeindependent.Ifforwhateverreasons,people’serrorsbecomecorrelatedordependent,theaccuracyoftheestimatewillgodown.ButanewstudyledbyJoaquinNavajasofferedaninterestingtwist(转折)onthisclassicphenomenon.Thekeyfindingofthestudywasthatwhencrowdswerefurtherdividedintosmallergroupsthatwereallowedtohaveadiscussion,theaveragesfromthesegroupsweremoreaccuratethanthosefromanequalnumberofindependentindividuals.Forinstance,theaverageobtainedfromtheestimatesoffourdiscussiongroupsoffivewassignificantlymoreaccuratethantheaverageobtainedfrom20independentindividuals.Inafollow-upstudywith100universitystudents,theresearcherstriedtogetabettersenseofwhatthegroupmembersactuallydidintheirdiscussion.Didtheytendtogowiththosemostconfidentabouttheirestimates?Didtheyfollowthoseleastwillingtochangetheirminds?Thishappenedsomeofthetime,butitwasn’tthedominantresponse.Mostfrequently,thegroupsreportedthatthey“sharedargumentsandreasonedtogether.”Somehow,theseargumentsandreasoningresultedinaglobalreductioninerror.AlthoughthestudiesledbyNavajashavelimitationsmanyquestionsremainthepotentialimplicationsforgroupdiscussionanddecision-makingareenormous.32.Whatisparagraph2ofthetextmainlyabout?A.Themethodsofestimation. B.Theunderlyinglogicoftheeffect.C.Thecausesofpeople’serrors. D.ThedesignofGalton’sexperiment.33.Navajas’studyfoundthattheaverageaccuracycouldincreaseevenif________.A.thecrowdswererelativelysmall B.therewereoccasionalunderestimatesC.individualsdidnotcommunicate D.estimateswerenotfullyindependent34.Whatdidthefollow-upstudyfocuson?A.Thesizeofthegroups. B.Thedominantmembers.C.Thediscussionprocess. D.Theindividualestimates.35.Whatistheauthor’sattitudetowardNavajas’studies?A.Unclear. B.Dismissive. C.Doubtful. D.Approving.02(2023年全国甲卷C篇)Iwasabout13whenanunclegavemeacopyofJosteinGaarder’sSophie’sWorld.Itwasfullofideasthatwerenewtome,soIspentthesummerwithmyheadinandoutofthatbook.Itspoketomeandbroughtmeintoaworldofphilosophy(哲学).ThatloveforphilosophylasteduntilIgottocollege.NothingkillstheloveforphilosophyfasterthanpeoplewhothinktheyunderstandFoucault,Baudrillard,orConfuciusbetterthanyou—andthentrytoexplainthem.EricWeiner’sTheSocratesExpress:InSearchofLifeLessonsfromDeadPhilosophersreawakenedmyloveforphilosophy.Itisnotanexplanation,butaninvitationtothinkandexperiencephilosophy.Weinerstartseachchapterwithasceneonatrainridebetweencitiesandthenframeseachphilosopher’sworkinthecontext(背景)ofonethingtheycanhelpusdobetter.TheendresultisareadinwhichwelearntowonderlikeSocrates,seelikeThoreau,listenlikeSchopenhauer,andhavenoregretslikeNietzsche.This,morethanabookaboutunderstandingphilosophy,isabookaboutlearningtousephilosophytoimprovealife.Hemakesphilosophicalthoughtanappealingexercisethatimprovesthequalityofourexperiences,andhedoessowithplentyofhumor.Weinerentersintoconversationwithsomeofthemostimportantphilosophersinhistory,andhebecomespartofthatcrowdintheprocessbydecoding(解读)theirmessagesandaddinghisowninterpretation.TheSocratesExpressisafun,sharpbookthatdrawsreadersinwithitsapparentsimplicityandgraduallypullsthemindeeperthoughtsondesire,loneliness,andaging.Theinvitationisclear:Weinerwantsyoutopickupacoffeeorteaandsitdownwiththisbook.Iencourageyoutotakehisoffer.It’sworthyourtime,eveniftimeissomethingwedon’thavealotof.28.Whoopenedthedoortophilosophyfortheauthor?A.Foucault. B.EricWeiner.C.JosteinGaarder. D.Acollegeteacher.29.Whydoestheauthorlistgreatphilosophersinparagraph4?A.TocompareWeinerwiththem.B.Togiveexamplesofgreatworks.C.Topraisetheirwritingskills.D.TohelpreadersunderstandWeinersbook.30.WhatdoestheauthorlikeaboutTheSocratesExpress?A.Itsviewsonhistoryarewell-presented.B.Itsideascanbeappliedtodailylife.C.Itincludesc

¥8/¥4VIP会员价

优惠:VIP会员免费下载,付费下载最高可省50%
注:已下载付费文档或VIP文档再次下载不会重复付费或扣除下载次数
购买VIP会员享超值特权
VIP专享免费下载,付费文档最高省50%
免费下载
付费折扣
身份标识
文档工具
限时7.4元/月购买VIP
全屏阅读
退出全屏
放大
缩小
扫码分享
扫一扫
手机阅读更方便
加入收藏
转PDF
付费下载 VIP免费下载

帮助
中心

联系
客服